Parchment & Pen Blog

Some Random Thoughts on Christian Ministry and Ministers


Comments 8 Comments

(Lisa Robinson)

These are some pretty random thoughts that have swirling around in my head for awhile so I wanted to just splash them out in writing. Tim Challies posted this article a while back on his blog that served as the catalyst. The article concerns the workforce but I think it’s premise is very transferable to Christian ministry. Basically, it highlights that productivity is best accomplished when we quietly do what we do and let the work speak for itself. When we’re secure and confident in what we do, there is no need to make a lot of noise about what we do.

Noise. This has been an increasing observation and concern regarding churches. When I say noise I mean advertising about what you do. Now it’s reasonable that in the 21st century technology age that you’ll want to do a certain amount of advertising. But sometimes the way churches and ministries are advertised make it seem that you will miss out on God if you don’t participate. Here’s where I think the principles of that article resonate. Churches should concentrate on being faithful and committed to the gospel rather than marketing and how to get more people in the door. I think this cartoon from the Naked Pastor  speaks volumes.

The same can be said of ministers, i.e., pastors and preachers. There is little that turns me off more than when I hear a pastor or church leader brag about what they are accomplishing or how great they are (usually embedded in language of how much the Lord is using me). I am convinced by scripture that it is Christ’s church. Those who get the opportunity to shepherd should be grateful and caring not noisy. Let the Lord use you to impact others and let them tell you how much they’ve been impacted. It doesn’t really mean much if the pastor or preacher talks about how much what they’re doing will change somebody’s life if it isn’t actually happening. I can’t help but wonder if it’s due to illusions that one has arrived. Paul Tripp posted an excellent article about delusions of grandeur.

Affirmation. This is proof that you don’t need to be noisy to be effective. Let others affirm how much they are being impacted. Now I get that the pastor/preacher has to be confident in the word they preach. But that can easily tip over to how much they are doing for others. The greatest validation is impacted lives not self-promotion about how much you bring to the table.

The message that will change your life. To be honest, this is a pet peeve of mine. The Lord and his Word change my life.  I personally think it’s pretty arrogant when pastors proclaim this and makes me wonder if they are putting more confidence in their ability to preach than in the Lord’s ability to transform. Your message on that day may not impact me at all, especially if it’s related to a pet agenda and is not necessarily gospel-centered.

Part of the problem is that we’ve developed a cult following around celebrity pastors. When crowds applaud it is easier to put faith in the personality of the preacher than in the word he is proclaiming. And hopefully he is faithfully preaching the Word, rather than opinions or worse. I’ve heard some egregious things come of the mouths of some well respected pastors. When you have large crowds, book deals, extensive marketing, and support from many, it’s pretty difficult to contradict.

Pastoring is a tricky and delicate task. I don’t envy the ones who sign up for it. I try not to get into the gender debate and think when it comes to church affiliation, we should just go where are theological convictions are compatible.  But my hats off to that woman who wants to shepherd a body and bears the tension of restrictions (whether by conviction or instruction). That’s not a position or fight I’m willing to engage in.

But pastors need our support. I believe there is a diminishing respect for authority that has crept into and results in a lack of respect for those who serve the body of Christ through shepherding and teaching. Christians, support your leaders and remember they have problems and life issues too, just like you.

On the flip side, pastors can take authority too far so that nobody can challenge them. In terms of church governance, my own convictions based on scripture reside with the presbyterian/plurality of elders model (this has been a shift over some time from a congregational model).  But although I believe that church should be led by a plurality of elders, they are also accountable to the congregation for leading them in truth, which means they must pay attention to what is going on in the congregation. If the elders are accountable to each other and to the gospel, it will work its way out with the congregation. Certainly, you will have the occasional disgruntled member.  But with a firm commitment to the gospel, church ministry and the Holy Spirit’s work, any issues with leadership should be resolved.

And speaking of accountability, situations that involve the solo pastor sans elders can be dangerous. Especially if the pastor/preacher has relied on a private revelatory affirmation of their “calling”. Well that goes back to affirmation.  I personally don’t believe that pastors/elders are necessarily “called into ministry” by some kind of mysterious revelatory conviction. All Christians are called into ministry by virtue of being called into the body of Christ. But the Lord has given some a greater capacity for responsibility for the flock and convicts them accordingly.   Affirmation of qualifications according to 1 Timothy and Titus are essential.

So I cringe when I hear that solo pastor/preacher castigate members for speaking against him. It’s the “touch not thine anointed” mentality.  If you are shepherding the flock they need to be shepherded, not intimidated, threatened or bludgeoned. Pastors should not bring harm to the congregation and the congregation should affirm your service with their lives. Here too, evidence if someone has elevated themselves into a position vs. affirmed by the community because they have the capacity to faithfully serve in that capacity. Notice, I said faithfully, which also means being committed to the historic doctrines of the Christian faith. I actually I sometimes wish there was some type of screening and/or licensing process for orthodoxy. I wonder how many spots that would eliminate. Who knows?

But what I do know is that Jesus said he would build his church and the power of death would not prevail against it. No matter what kind of craziness exists, the Holy Spirit is big enough to handle it.

Similar Posts:

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
 

8 Comments

  1. Irene says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    Hi Lisa,

    You said, “I sometimes wish there was some type of screening and/or licensing process for orthodoxy.”
    Who would write the test? Mainstream denominations already have something along these lines. I don’t know exactly where you are coming from, but perhaps you are talking about a purely nondenominational setting?

    Irene

  2. Lisa Robinson says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    Irene, yes I’m thinking more in line with independent churches.

  3. Steve Martin says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    If we (the congregants) were more biblically literate, then these preachers wouldn’t be able to get away with their shenanigans.

    Our pastor tells us that if we hear him preach something other than the gospel, then we had better throw a hymnal at him, right there in the middle of the sermon.

  4. Irene says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    @Lisa’s #2,

    Only then those independent churches would no longer be so independent.

  5. Yates says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    Great article Lisa,

    Perhaps a screening process might simply be agreement with the major creeds?

  6. Curt Parton says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    Amen, Lisa. Excellent post.

  7. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    [...] articles on supporting your pastor(s): One from Lisa Robinson at Parchment and Pen, and one from Keith Brenton at Blog in My Own [...]

  8. Julius Henry says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    Nice article, well done. This stands in contrast to what I heard in the Vertical Church tour earlier this month from James Macdonald…lots of noise and the cult of personality pastors.

More Comments:


Post a Comment








 

 characters available

Sponsors

Follow Credo House On:

      

Follow Michael Patton On:

      

Receive Blog via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Buy Anything on Amazon & Support our Ministry

Blog Rules

Please adhere to the following rules to prevent banishment to Siberia (no offense to our Siberian visitors):

  • Do not use the blog to promote yourself, as your surrogate blog, or as an advertisement. I am sure you are interesting and have some really nice things to say, but you can get your own blog.
  • Do not call authors out for debate. You must count the cost (Lk. 14:31). You don’t want to get whipped up on anyway.
  • Keep your comments short. Like when your comments are longer than the blog, that is too long.
  • Read All 6 Rules

Search Parchment & Pen

Donate

If you believe in and benefit from this ministry, please consider becoming a parter by donating here. One-time and monthly donors are both greatly appreciated!

Get Email Updates Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon

For Email Marketing you can trust

Our Classes

Theological Word of the Day

Textus Receptus
(Latin, “received text”) The Textus Receptus (TR), or “received text,” refers to the first published Greek New Testament edited by Desiderius Erasmus in 1516 and later, with some changes, by Stephanus, Beza and Elzivir. This text was initially compiled using only seven late Greek manuscripts (11th-13th centuries). The TR became the underlying text for many [...] continue reading