Parchment & Pen Blog

Jeremiah 29:11 As a Life Verse?


Comments 15 Comments

(Lisa Robinson)

As a follow to this post on life verses, I’ve been reminded that Jeremiah 29:11 is a fairly common one claimed as a personal, individual promise. But is Jeremiah 29:11 a promise for us today or was it related to a particular situation at a particular time? Was it an individual promise or a corporate promise?  Voddie Baucham has some interesting things to say in this 6 minute clip. (Although I wish he would have left out the God killing part given controversy over recent statements).

Examining vs 11 in context of the entirety of what Jeremiah tells a different story than how the verse has been claimed. It’s why I wrote here that we have to careful when turning narrative or prophetic discourse into a personal prescription for today. As Baucham points out, it can have very harmful consequences.

What do you think? I would be interested to hear a defense for using it today.

Follow me on Twitter @theochick

Similar Posts:

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
 

15 Comments

  1. Scott says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1

    While I completely agree we cannot claim the promise for our lives today, don’t you think we can take the promise of a future hope basedon God’s covenant and draw significance for our lives for the future hope that awaits the believer in Christ? In other words, God is not promising to bring prosperity to us, but reading this text in light of the New Testament, we can say that God has a plan for our lives and it comes to completion at Christ’s return. Therefore, no matter how tough life gets here in this life, we can be assured it is meant for our sanctification and will culminate in our glorification with Christ.

  2. Mike O says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1

    First of all, that was a great clip. After watching it, I think people *do* misuse that verse. I know I did. Not in the prosperity gospel way that he portrays, but in the way I take that verse personally.

    However ….

    Is it better to say that God does *not* have good plans for me? Not in a prosperity way, but in a “god has a plan for me” way? I think it would be very difficult to look at the whole of scripture and come away with the message that God *doesn’t* have good plans for ME. But I would temper that with the notion that I don’t know what “good” looks like. As he said, I have bad days. Lots of them. I’m having them right now. But that doesn’t change the fact that God has my best in mind. Even if I don’t like it. Even if it means I die.

    To your point about taking “a verse” … Jer 29:11 … and “using it” to say God is going to prosper me, I agree with you that that verse doesn’t say that to ME. But at the same time, God DOES have good plans for his people as individuals. Plans to prosper us as individuals and to give us as individuals a hope and a future. We just can’t pin it on that verse, we have to pin it on the whole of scripture.

    Even though life may be hard or even deadly, that does not change the fact that Gods plans for me are GOOD (by his definition, not mine). He has given me a GOOD future (by his definition, not mine).

    But point taken … that verse, taken out of context like we have, is probably being misused to make the case for God’s good favor towards us as individuals. Towards ME.

  3. HC says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    “controversy over recent statements”

    what is this?

  4. mbaker says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    While I agree that we cannot just proof text only the verses that we want to apply to us, I do think Mike O. is right is saying that the whole of scripture points to a good future for us, if not on earth then certainly in heaven.

    Sometimes i think context is a bit overused. If we only take the Bible in historical context probably none of the stuff would apply to us in the epistles, since Paul was speaking directly to the the churches of his time. I just don’t think context alone is thorough enough hermeneutics to make me totally discourage ‘life’ verses.

    As I have said before the biggest verse we use as a corporate church is John 3:16, to use in the conversion of non-believers, so we would have to take that of the picture as well, if we are to totally disregard the value of life verses in reaching people.

  5. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    God’s scripture is for all of us as well as His promises.

  6. Mike O says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    @BTCIO, did someone suggest otherwise? Are you saying Jer 29:11 a promise God made to you?

  7. Dan says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    all are doing there interpretation just to make money,
    and we are stupid to linsent to them.

  8. EMSoliDeoGloria says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    What does it mean to consider it a “life verse?”

    Jer 29:11 isn’t a talisman nor is it a specific promise to every person who ever lived. True enough.

    But it is a verse that has reminded me of God’s care, his faithfulness to his people, and his nearness to be found by me when I seek him (because he first called me out of darkness and in to light).

    So, I don’t see it as a prophetic verse for me specifically but it is a passage that I love and remember and am particularly grateful for.

  9. mbaker says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    “…it is a verse that has reminded me of God’s care, his faithfulness to his people, and his nearness to be found by me when I seek him (because he first called me out of darkness and in to light).

    “So, I don’t see it as a prophetic verse for me specifically but it is a passage that I love and remember and am particularly grateful for.”

    I agree on that, because at one time in my life when I was very, very sick, and thought I was dying, it was what gave me hope to carry on.

    While it should not be our complete theology, and I am totally against that, BTW, it is an example of the Holy Spirit giving us verses we personally need in parts of our lives to give us inspiration.

  10. GoldCityDance says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    I believe this is one of the instances where “tradition” can be a useful source of truth to interpret Scripture. How did the early Gentile church fathers interpret Jeremiah 29:11? Has this verse been interpreted universally and consistently over two millennia by Christians as a individual promise for Gentile Christians?

    I have a suspicion the personal interpretation is closely linked to the prosperity gospel. Also, if Jeremiah 29:11 is indeed a universal verse applicable for all Christians, why didn’t Paul or the other NT writers use it to comfort the early Gentile Christians (who were being persecuted) in their writings? Surely it would be a very pertinent verse to be deployed under those circumstances.

  11. mbaker says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    Gold city,

    From what you said, I am not sure how you are discounting this, except that is OT. perhaps you could clarify. You kept mentioning gentiles. Are you Jewish?

    I believe there are extremes on both sides that carry their arguments too far. Nothing wrong with having a favorite scripture but that alone does not mean we are using this one as WOF theology. That’s a sweeping generalization, IIMO.

    Prosperity can mean different things to different to different
    people. To me, it meant a hope for better health that I could believe in the time, and it proved true.

    Our theology should not be based on pick and choose life verses as I have stated before, but we all have our favorite verses. Are we to be condemned because of it? Only if we think that’s all there is to the whole counsel of God.

  12. GoldCityDance says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    mbaker, I kept making a point about Gentile Christians because when read in context, Jeremiah 29:11 was addressed towards the Jewish nation, particularly those who were exiled at Babylon (verses 1 and 4). So one of the points of debate brought up by this blog post is whether Jeremiah 29:11 is a personal promise for Gentile believers as well.

    No, I am a Gentile.

  13. Nobuo says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    My reading yetdersay included John 12:46-48 “I have come into the world as a light, so that no one who believes in me should stay in darkness. If anyone hears my words but does not keep them, I do not judge that person. For I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world. There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; the very words I have spoken will condemn them at the last day.” It’s just a great reminder to me that we are here lead people to Christ not to judge them, yet at the same time judgment is real which intensifies my desire to help people know the grace and salvation that comes only from Christ. I’m with Stephen Haggerty, great idea for a post, Josh. Hope to see you at camp next week.

  14. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0

    [...] try to set the record straight explaining what is a more probable interpretation. Some examples are Jeremiah 29:11, Matthew 18:20, 2 Tim 2:13, and the notion “all sins are equal in God’s eyes” or [...]

More Comments:


Post a Comment








 

 characters available

Sponsors

Follow Credo House On:

      

Follow Michael Patton On:

      

Receive Blog via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Buy Anything on Amazon & Support our Ministry

Blog Rules

Please adhere to the following rules to prevent banishment to Siberia (no offense to our Siberian visitors):

  • Do not use the blog to promote yourself, as your surrogate blog, or as an advertisement. I am sure you are interesting and have some really nice things to say, but you can get your own blog.
  • Do not call authors out for debate. You must count the cost (Lk. 14:31). You don’t want to get whipped up on anyway.
  • Keep your comments short. Like when your comments are longer than the blog, that is too long.
  • Read All 6 Rules

Search Parchment & Pen

Donate

If you believe in and benefit from this ministry, please consider becoming a parter by donating here. One-time and monthly donors are both greatly appreciated!

Get Email Updates Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon

For Email Marketing you can trust

Our Classes

Theological Word of the Day

Textus Receptus
(Latin, “received text”) The Textus Receptus (TR), or “received text,” refers to the first published Greek New Testament edited by Desiderius Erasmus in 1516 and later, with some changes, by Stephanus, Beza and Elzivir. This text was initially compiled using only seven late Greek manuscripts (11th-13th centuries). The TR became the underlying text for many [...] continue reading