Leaving (Christ)ianity – An Evangelical Epidemic
I sat down with a young lady a couple of weeks ago and had a conversation. This was a conversation about faith—her faith. Better put, this was a conversation about a faith that once was and is no more. She was a very interesting and bright lady—inquisitive, well-read, and suspicious. She began by telling me that she was a Christian (past tense) and had since left the faith. Christ was once a part of her confession, but, as she recounted to me, after a long voyage of not finding sufficient answers for her doubts, she believes that she had no choice but to follow her own integrity and renounce Christ all together. I asked her what her problems were and she became very emotional. It was like I represented Christianity and she was ready to take it all out on me.
Ignorance. Pity. Shame. These are all good descriptions of what she thought of Christianity. But the primary description that I felt coming from here was “betrayal.” She had been betrayed by the Church because they duped her into a belief not unlike that of the tooth fairy. When she discovered this betrayal, no one had a valid answer or excuse. So she left. She is now an unbeliever—a soon-to-be evangelistic unbeliever.
One fascination, obsession, and focus (neurotic pulse?) I have in my life and ministry is with regard to those, like this young lady, who leave the faith. You may have noticed this. I have over a dozen books giving autobiographical sketches of those who once proclaimed to be Christian and are now evangelistic atheists, agnostics, or skeptics, with their goal to convert or, rather, unconvert others. I have been in contact with many people who either have already left or are on the verge of leaving. I get emails, phone calls, and visits from the same.
No, it is not a neurotic pulse. I believe that it is the recognition of an extremely serious issue that we are facing today. We are facing an epidemic in Christianity—an epidemic of unbelief among our own. Crowding our churches are those who are somewhere in the process of leaving. No, I am not talking about leaving a denomination. I am not talking about abandoning some institutionalized expression of Christianity. I am not talking about leaving the church (though related). And I am not even talking about renouncing religion. I am talking about those who are leaving Christ.
Over 31 million Americans are saying “check please” to the church, and are off to find answers elsewhere. Jeff Schadt, coordinator of Youth Transition Network, says thousands of youth fall away from the church when transitioning from high school to college. He and other youth leaders estimate that 65 to 94 percent of high school students stop attending church after graduating. From my studies and experience I find that leaving church is many times the first visible step in one’s pilgrimage away from Christ.
The question that we must ask is a very simple one: Why? Why are people leaving the faith at this epidemic and alarming rate? In my studies, I have found that the two primary reasons people leave the faith are 1) intellectual challenges and 2) bad theology or misplaced beliefs.
First, I want to explain this transition process, focusing on the first: intellectual challenges. You might even find yourself somewhere on this journey.
Step one: Doubt
Step two: Discouragement
Step three: Disillusionment
Step four: Apathy
Step five: Departure
Step One: Doubt
Here is where the person begins to examine his or her faith more critically by asking questions, expressing concerns, and becoming transparent with their doubt. This doubt is not wholesale, but expresses an inner longing to have questions answered and the intellect satisfied to some degree. Normally this person will inquire of mentors in the faith, requesting an audience for their doubt.
Step Two: Discouragement
This is where the person becomes frustrated because they are not finding the answers. They ask questions but the answer (or lack thereof) causes them discouragement. Their church tells them that such questions are “unchristian.” Their Sunday school teacher says, “I don’t know. You just have to believe.” Others
simply say, “That’s a good question, I have never thought of it before,” and then go on their way on their own leap-of-faith journey.
Step Three: Disillusionment
Now the person begins to become disillusioned with Christianity in general and proceeds to doubt much more deeply. They feel betrayed by those who made them believe the story about Christ. They feel that much of their former faith was naive since not even their most trusted mentors could (or would) answer basic questions about the Bible, history, or faith. In their thinking the intellect has become illegitimized and the church is therefore an illegitimate contender for their mind.
Step Four: Apathy
At this point in the journey, the disillusioned Christian becomes apathetic to finding the answers, believing that the answers don’t exist. They are firmly on their way to atheism, agnosticism, or pure skepticism but don’t have the courage to admit it to themselves or others. Many times those in this stage live as closet unbelievers, believing it is not worth it to come clean about their departure from the faith. They want a peaceful existence in their unbelief without creating controversy. Therefore, they are content to remain closet unbelievers.
Step Five: Departure
Here is where I meet this young lady I told you about. (Really, she was somewhere in-between apathy and departure.) At this stage the fact that they have left the faith has become real to them and they are willing to announce to the world. Because of their sense of betrayal, they feel as if it is their duty to become evangelists for the cause of unbelief. Their goal and mission becomes to unconvert the converted.
“I don’t really even care what you have to say to me,” she told me that day. “I just don’t believe anymore and there is nothing anyone can do about it.” As I thought about this young lady over the last week, only one thing keeps coming to mind: how was she a part of the church for so long without the church engaging her on these issues. You see, her issues were numerous, but foundational. She doubted the resurrection of Christ, the inspiration, inerrancy, and canon of Scripture, and the historicity of the Christian faith in general. If the church had legitimized her questions during the doubting phase and truly engaged her from an intellectual front I can’t help but think, from a human point of view, things might have been different. But once she reaches the point of apathy, this seems to be a point of no return.
My life and my ministry is committed to one thing: rooting people theologically by presenting the intellectual viability of the Evangelical faith. While I understand this is not all there is to the Christian faith, it is an absolute vital part of discipleship and foundational to everything else.
Everyone will go through the doubt phase. Everyone should ask questions about the faith. If you have not asked the “How do you know . . .” questions about the message of the Gospel, this is not a good thing. We should be challenged to think through these questions early in the faith. The Church needs to rethink its education program. Expositional preaching, while important, is not enough. Did you hear that? Expositional preaching is not enough. It does not provide the discipleship venue that is vital for us to prevent and overcome this epidemic. We should not fool ourselves into thinking that it does.
The church has been on an intellectual diet for the last century and we are suffering from theological atrophy. What else do you expect when we have replaced theological discipleship with a gluttonous promotion of entertainment, numbers, and fast-food Christianity that can produce nothing more than a veneer of faith seasoned for departure?
The solution: to reform our educational program in the church. To lay theological foundations through critical thinking. To understand that the great commission is to make disciples, not simply converts. And most importantly, we must pray that God will grant a revival of the mind knowing that without the power of the Holy Spirit, no amount of intellectual persuasion can change an antagonistic heart.
Without these, the epidemic of leaving Christ will only worsen.
“The heart will not accept what the mind rejects.” —Jonathan Edwards
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!- Leaving Christ(ianity) – A Christian Epidemic
- People Leaving the Church: What Do We Do?
- Leaving Christianity for All the Wrong Reasons
- Leaving Christianity for all the Wrong Reasons
- The Bridge Called Doubt
Print This Post

Peter on 31 Jul 2008 at 7:38 pm #
I don’t see how critical thinking is somehow necessarily the answer to everything. Some people never think critically about these things, and that’s fine for them. I mean, Christianity is “foolishness for Greeks” as Paul said, not “common sense for Greeks once you think critically”.
Other people (and I would put myself in this camp), spend a lot of time thinking critically, but don’t necessarily feel like I’ve got the answers. Neither do I feel in any danger of leaving the faith. Sometimes we stay not because we have the answer, but for the simple reason Peter stated, “Lord, to whom shall we go (jn 6:68)” if we did leave.
As well, looking to a western scholastic notion that we can come up with critical answers to all problems could be setting yourself up for failure. Maybe more answers would have kept that woman in the faith, but maybe you don’t have enough answers to keep her in. Maybe loving her more would have shown her the love of Christ and kept her in. Maybe more prayer and mystical experience would have kept her in. Maybe nothing would have kept her in. Don’t always rush headlong to the “we need more brain food” answer without considering other options.
Daniel on 01 Aug 2008 at 5:46 pm #
I am inclined to agree with Peter. The lady you spoke of in your blog was described as having an intense emotional response to your questions about why she left Christ. I feel like her problems were not a matter of intellectual dissatisfaction but were instead deeply personal and emotional. I have found that the decision to follow Jesus Christ is a bit like the decision to marry a particular person. It is not fundamentally based on reason and the needs of the intellect but is a deep personal decision that comes from the whole of who we are, not simply what we think. Friends of mine who reject Christ don’t do so based on an intellectual dissatisfaction with Christian beliefs. Instead, they do so based on feelings of anger, fear and abandonment concerning Christ and the Church. These feelings cannot be satisfied by an effective rational argument defending Christian Theology.
I agree with Patton, however, when he says: “The church has been on an intellectual diet for the last century and we are suffering from theological atrophy.” Unless we can provide a coherent and reasonable explanation of what we believe we cannot hope to be taken seriously by the modern world. We need to equip all believes with a reasonable explanation of what they believe and why. Let us simply be careful to not assume that this will stem the tide of people leaving Christ. The reasons for a person leaving are varied and unique to each individual. We must not simply limit ourselves to the intellectual realm and reasons when considering people’s departure from the Christian faith.
Also, those that decry this modern trend of “departure” would be wise to remind themselves that only very recently has the separation of Church and state become the norm. Prior to this separation to be Italian, for example, was to be Roman Catholic. There was no other option. Given that one’s Christian faith was not a matter of choice but a matter of culture can we really say that more people were Christians prior to the modern age? Perhaps we are simply raising the bar on what it takes to be a follower of Christ. Now-a-days we are, and rightly so, concerned with a person’s relationship with Christ and less with where they are on Sunday morning. We have to remember that, some time ago, simply paying lip service to the Church was enough to be considered Christian.
Miguel Mesa on 02 Aug 2008 at 3:27 pm #
Great post Michael. This is great fodder for ongoing discussion. I too am very fascinated with the ‘departure’ phenomenon.
Peter and Daniel, I can hear what you two are saying and I think their are good points in there but I wonder if you are making a hard and fast line in categorizing the emotional man from the intellectual man. I agree also that not everyone is the same in their intellectual drive or can easily go to the more ‘deeper’ facets of the knowing process. However, it is certain that everyone has governing presuppositions that simply can go unexamined. This is where the issue lies. I believe this is the place where the high thinkers of the church need to be better practitioners in engaging the culture.
Those who can go there intellectually have a responsibility to bring to bear that knowledge to others. There are ways of doing this without going into straight-up erudition.
I do believe too that the gospel is foolishness to the greeks, but I also think there is sovereignly God ordained way to bring all high thinking under the captivity and Lordship of Christ. I believe this involves careful theological precision and presuppositional analysis.
I think this young woman did and does have intellectual barriers that in time can be engaged. Is it all there is to engage? No. But it clearly is one major component of being requiring the renewal….of the mind and everything else.
I have been through a similar sifting of sorts. I have not arrived and obviously will not; eternal epistemic dependency.
I think the five steps you delineated here Michael a very helpful. I see the reality to which they point very clearly in the lives of people I am intimately in community with.
Shalom,
Miguel
Keith Buhler on 03 Aug 2008 at 8:59 pm #
Any minister to high schoolers (Christian or non) knows the truth of what you say. Perhaps we ministers have been the victims of the “five steps,” and returned to or remained with Christ by some other miracle.
Intellectual growth is absolutely essential. But add to that, if you will, the renovation of the heart through spiritual disciplines. And add to these the daily engagement with the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit.
Even with the Christian worldview re-planted into the Western intellectual plausibility structure, vast percentages of people will ‘depart’ if they have minds and characters conformed to the pattern of the sinful world through daily exercise therein. Rather, they must not only think Christianly, but exercise daily the disciplines of silence, solitude, fasting, prayer, fellowship, celebration, communion, etc. that form a person into a supernatural disciple. None of which is possible without radical belief and trust in the active supernatural workings of the Holy Spirit, which is like the beauty of a flower or the taste of coffee chocolate — it must be seen and tasted rather than argued for.
This is a poor paraphrase of Dr. JP Moreland’s Kingdom Triangle.
Thank you for your thoughts.
Keith Buhler on 03 Aug 2008 at 9:14 pm #
Under ‘Doubt,’ it seems that we need some sub-categories to detail exactly what is being doubted. Here’s a start.
1. Doubting the existence of ethical truths. CS Lewis’ Abolition of Man
2. Doubting the goodness of a hidden God. CS Lewis’ Till We Have Faces
3. Doubting the existence of aesthetic truths. Sheldon Van Auken’s Severe Mercy
4. Doubting the plausibility of Christianity in the face of modern science. GK Chesterton’s Orthodoxy & Everlasting Man. See also the Dogma is the Drama, an essay by Dorothy L. Sayers
5. Doubting any optimistic vision of the future in the face of modern science. Huxley’s Brave New World
6. Doubting the basic tenets of traditional Christianity. CS Lewis’ Mere Christianity.
George Radman on 04 Aug 2008 at 8:05 am #
“The solution: to reform our educational program in the church; to lay theological foundations through critical thinking”
[see Reading and Discussing Scripture and Teaching in Contradiction at http://pop.eradman.com/
Tony on 04 Aug 2008 at 8:58 am #
I do see a lack of spiritual formation here are a key issue. The old commentators called it ‘experiential knowledge’, however books and spiritual disciplines still are not sufficient.
I believe that in western Christianity the lack of community, life done before and with others is a huge chasm. When we do life in community, is when we see the sticky stuff of life revealed, and see the grace of Jesus manifest. It also trains us to see a God bigger than our own intellectual framework, a God beyond.
The problem with our (US/Western) church is that it is not discipled to give of itself in a non-programed way, joining of lives and hearts. We end up with Religion not Relationship, we end up with a form of godliness but lacking the power.
Parchment and Pen » Leaving Christianity for all the Wrong Reasons on 05 Aug 2008 at 9:22 am #
[...] the last post in this series I discussed why people leave Christianity, focusing on intellectual reasons. This post will focus [...]
Albert on 05 Aug 2008 at 11:50 am #
As an ex-Evangelical Christian I would like to leave some feedback to this post because I don’t think most Christians can even begin to understand how someone could leave the faith.
I would like everyone who reads my post to also realize that my overall church experience was positive and that negative experiences were not the catalyst in the process of leaving as seems to be the case for many former Christians.
I think the five stages as outlined above are a reasonable framework to use although up to now (and it’s been four years since I left my Evangelical church) I’ve never gone through an apathetic stage.
It wasn’t until I went from the Anglican church to the Evangelical one that I think I really took Christianity seriously. Unfortunately perhaps I now realize that embracing Evangelical Christianity was going to set me irrevocably on a path out of Christianity. for the first time in my life not only did I seriously read the Bible but also a wide variety of books about the Bible and Christian belief. It doesn’t take long in such a process before inevitable questions will arise unless you read such material in a superficial fashion. And yes the “non answers” you get from your local church are incredible and yet I wasn’t going to give up that easily. So over the span of five years or so I spent probably in excess of two thousand hours reading books (100+) across as wide a spectrum of beliefs and opinions as possible, reading countless internet posts. emailing and going out to lunch with several ministers and so on. If I had any bias in any of this process it was that more than anything I WANTED Christianity to be true. But alas in the end I realized why Christianity can’t give good answers to tough but fair questions, it’s because there aren’t any (or many). On the whole, with some exceptions, the critics of Christianity and its theology have the better arguments. It’s not even close folks, although I don’t expect anyone here will take my word for it.
A “watershed issue” for me so to speak was the second coming of Christ. You all know the passage “some standing here shall not taste of death before they see…..”. It’s one of many in the New Testament that alludes to the return of Christ before all his contemporaries have died. Even Paul is looking forward to this happening in the not too distant future. I focused a lot of my study on this particular issue. The text of the NT demands that the return of Jesus will be in the few decades after his death. Even C.S. Lewis in his writings “The world’s last night” admits that Jesus led his followers to believe that his return would be in the near future. He then tries to explain it away by saying it was the fallible human part of Jesus which made this prediction which of course only serves to make one wonder what other things Jesus may have been mistaken about.
When I approached a variety of pastors with these observations I usually got a lot of evasive hand wringing and muttering. The best anyone could do was to somehow see a (partial) return of Jesus in the destruction of the Temple. Sorry folks no cigar for that answer.
There are many powerful forces which keep Christians in their belief system. I heartily recommend the following book to anyone is genuinely interested in why people hold beliefs (not necessarily religious one) with such fervor and are loathe to give them up even in the face of strong contrary evidence,
Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts: Carol Tavris, Elliot Aronson.
Thanks for reading my long post and I welcome any thoughtful responses (aka please don’t bother with cliches and threats of hell
)
Albert on 05 Aug 2008 at 3:00 pm #
Any reason why it’s taking so long to post my comment?
Jeffrey on 05 Aug 2008 at 7:50 pm #
I am also a former evangelical, and had an experience similar to Albert except that I let go far, far before the 100 book mark. (I lost intellectual assent to the resurrection in April ‘08, but admitted this to myself gradually.)
If it is the case that Christianity is true, Michael has nailed what about the church caused me to think it isn’t. However, I think the problem is not in the manner in which Christians believe but the unavoidable result of trying to believe that which isn’t true.
One the one side, you have positions of reasonable people trying to be academically honest, and hence rejecting pieces of the mainstream belief that they have studied in most depth (i.e., qualified inerrency, Armenianism, emerging Christianity, rejecting presuppositional apologetics, theistic evolution/ID + common decent, Peter Enns’ take on the OT, preterism), and on the other hand you have people who just want to believe and are tired of having their faith shot at by people in their own camp (i.e., fundamentalists).
Of course some Christians think the first category is a breath of academically honest fresh air, while the other side sees it as challenging their faith! That’s what happens when someone deceived by 80% of a position speaks to two people deceived by 70% and 90%.
Becoming a theistic evolutionist opened my eyes to how most Christians view (or don’t view) evidence. It’s hard to read about the skull of an ape-man, read one creationist say it’s an ape, another say it’s a man, and then another say it’s just evolutionists’ naturalistic assumptions that cause them to see an ape-man.
It’s harder still to next hear an apologist argue that the reason skeptics don’t see evidence for the resurrection is because their presuppositions will not allow it. Following this with reading purely biblical arguments that the gospel contradictions demonstrate the unreliability of the witnesses was fatal to my faith. (I could provide a link, of course, but I will refrain.)
The scientific content and theological implications of evolution played nearly no role in my departure, but what I learned about Christianity from the creation science/ID movement was significant. Of course, I had to see for myself that apologists arguments are just much weaker than skeptics to go from disillusioned Christian to skeptic. But without a doubt, the hard part was realizing that even if it was the case that Christianity is wrong, and even obviously wrong, most Christians have not looked at the opposing arguments enough to know the difference.
Christians typically avoid reading books by skeptics as it is “dangerous.” Skeptics have no need to warn against apologists or the Bible, but just make arguments and present evidence. Of course, there are exceptions, but these are usually the sort of Christians who are rocking the boat. This alone is very telling.
Peter on 05 Aug 2008 at 10:18 pm #
The internet monk has a podcast saying that 90% or something of people attending an evengelical seminary have left the faith within 5 years. These are the people with access to the best of the best in evangelical thought.
On the other hand, some of the greatest Christians in history have not been academic at all.
I don’t know what goes on at Evangelical seminaries, but something tells me there is a lot of theological naval gazing, and not much about self discipline and making yourself a great Christian.
art on 06 Aug 2008 at 9:51 am #
Peter,
If you don’t know what goes on at Evangelical seminaries, then it’s probably best not to state that you think there is “not much about self discipline and making yourself a great Christian.” That simply is not fair and is completely uncharitable.
As a side note, no one can make themselves a “great” Christian. It is God who began a good work in us and will be faithful to complete it.
Wes on 06 Aug 2008 at 12:00 pm #
Interesting post, raising important questions. I’m wondering, though, if a more foundational problem exists. Without minimizing the importance of addressing intellectual challenges, perhaps the issue is that Evangelicals have redefined what it means to be a Christian in the first place. Jesus is pretty clear about the impossibility of being his follower without the New Birth – and that those who are regenerated are kept by the work of the Holy Spirit. In the words of John, “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.” (1 John 2:19)
Perhaps in the pursuit of numbers, Evangelicalism has forgotten that – absent regeneration – people aren’t “Christians” regardless of their attendance or intellectual beliefs… and that those who are genuinely converted persevere in the faith.
Mere Orthodoxy » The Evangelical Epidemic on 07 Aug 2008 at 7:01 am #
[...] C Michael Patton carefully observes the (increasingly common) trend of people becoming doubtful, disillusioned, and eventually departing from Christ. [...]
Peter Burgers on 07 Aug 2008 at 9:58 am #
Albert,
Interesting post! What about your “watershed issue”… do you like to email with me about it? Do so at m.burgers7@kpnplanet.nl
It was great to be here.
Cate on 07 Aug 2008 at 3:16 pm #
I grew up in a vibrant Christian home and went to a good Christian college. Despite my surroundings and upbringing, my time at college was a great test to my faith, and I left the church for a few years.
Through good conversations with loving people and seminary, my faith is much stronger then the childhood version I had embraced. When I think about what went wrong, I am pretty sure it was because I was always given the right ideas but the wrong arguments for them. The truth was still the truth, but my reasons for believing it were no good and had to be reworked.
As a Spiritual Director and teacher I’ve noticed how often this is the case in the lives of others as well. Late high school and college are a great time of personal formation. Too many of our churches are promoting a faith in Christ that can’t stand the tests that come with personal maturity and intellectual development. No wonder our youth are leaving.
Sometimes I fear that it is only the stupid or immature that will stay with the church if we don’t learn how to teach our children well. Our methodology must become worthy of our beliefs.
austin on 11 Aug 2008 at 10:41 pm #
I was evangelical and left the evangelical church for the Catholic church. That journey to the catholic church began when I began to have doubts about all that I had been led to believe about church history & catholic beliefs. Honesty and fairness about those outside the fold is important.
Leaving Christianity « The Contrarian Mormon on 15 Aug 2008 at 9:54 pm #
[...] under: Uncategorized — mahonri @ 2:47 am I found this article the evangelical Christian Parchment & Pen blog. Many have noticed an epidemic of faithlessness in the last few years, which is infecting many [...]
George Radman on 01 Sep 2008 at 8:31 pm #
There are all kinds of Bible “lessons” that teach good things, but there is little that connects the individual lessons. Too often people only see bits and pieces of the whole instead of learning the story the whole Bible tells – to get at the meaning of events and teachings that will tie them all together. In a 2002 book, God’s Big Picture – Tracing the storyline of the Bible, Vaughan Roberts describes himself as about to embark on a 2 year training course for the ministry. “I had been a committed Christian for six years, but my knowledge of the Bible, especially the Old Testament was very limited…I had already completed a theology degree at university, but it left me unable to find my way around the Bible. There had been detailed analysis of individual books and passages, but no-one had shown me how they fitted together.” He met someone who “was able to travel through the Bible with apparent ease…as if he was using a map…while I was left without any sense of direction.” His new friend introduced him to Gospel and Kingdom by Graeme Goldsworthy, “I had the map I needed. I was still very ignorant about much of the Bible, but the framework was in place.” So he wrote God’s Big Picture to help others understand how different parts of the Bible fit together.
Sunday I met a worship leader whose life was transformed by this book.
Kate on 09 Mar 2009 at 1:06 pm #
This girl sounds like me about five years ago. When you look to Christianity for answers and Christianity isn’t giving any answers, you simply need to look elsewhere. It wasn’t until I had been an evangelical unbeliever for a few years that I found someone who had actually thought about these issues. Before that, I was often damned to hell by evangelicals for even raising issues. Or else people would often assume I just needed a hug instead of answers.
I’m not so sure that the whole issue is a spiritual formation or issue with how a person feels. Much of that, I believe, is based on personality (thinking or feeling oriented) and many people simply go where the facts lead. A church that refuses to engage with the issues of this world might as well move its congregation out onto a deserted island, because it isn’t engaging with the world anyway.
God gave us minds and knowledge of him. Sure, there are tons of things we don’t know for sure, but we still have the responsibility of using our minds to praise him.