<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Sola Scriptura &#8211; Part Six &#8211; Apostolic Succession?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/07/in-defense-of-sola-scriptura-part-six-apostolic-succession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/07/in-defense-of-sola-scriptura-part-six-apostolic-succession/</link>
	<description>Making Theology Accessible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iwka</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/07/in-defense-of-sola-scriptura-part-six-apostolic-succession/comment-page-1/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>iwka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/?p=1048#comment-4201</guid>
		<description>&quot;From my perspective (and I think I speak with some common sense here), if God wanted believers to see the Church as an institutional authority that houses infallibility, either through the unity of the bishops or the ex cathedra statements of the Pope, then it goes without saying that this would be a primary doctrine that the Bible should address.&quot;

The Bible does not address straightforward the doctrine of Trinity either. Is that common sense? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From my perspective (and I think I speak with some common sense here), if God wanted believers to see the Church as an institutional authority that houses infallibility, either through the unity of the bishops or the ex cathedra statements of the Pope, then it goes without saying that this would be a primary doctrine that the Bible should address.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Bible does not address straightforward the doctrine of Trinity either. Is that common sense? <img src='http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Sola Scriptura, Watchmen &#38; Deification, TEDS ClobberBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/07/in-defense-of-sola-scriptura-part-six-apostolic-succession/comment-page-1/#comment-4200</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Sola Scriptura, Watchmen &#38; Deification, TEDS ClobberBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/?p=1048#comment-4200</guid>
		<description>[...] if tradition is fallible, how do you know the biblical canon is infallible? Here is an excerpt from Part 6 &#8212; Apostolic Succession?: It is agreed that Peter and the apostles were given authority and the guidance to teach the truth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if tradition is fallible, how do you know the biblical canon is infallible? Here is an excerpt from Part 6 &#8212; Apostolic Succession?: It is agreed that Peter and the apostles were given authority and the guidance to teach the truth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
