Doing Philosophy Under the Cross
Martin Luther talked of a “theology of the cross” (theologia cruces), The God who suffers with and for human beings reveals himself in humility—most clearly in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. Luther disapproved of “theologians of glory” who confidently presented abstract “proofs.” Why? Such theologians may be in danger of obscuring both the cross, which casts “God’s shadow,” and of diminishing the fact that God veils himself for particular reasons. It is true that salvation comes through our self-abandonment and humbling ourselves in response to God’s grace. Even if we may disagree with Luther to some extent, we shouldn’t forget that human reasoning—even constructing arguments for God’s nature and existence— without the aid of the cross and the Spirit of God will miss the mark. Luther is right to point us in a cruciform or crucicentric direction; indeed, the world-defying wisdom of God is found in the cross (1 Cor. 1:18). Continue Reading »
determine its veracity.” I believe this is true. There are two key words here: “palatability” and “determine.”
